[RS3Dell]

My results achieved are for all to see. They’re in this thread in black and white. Timing slips and all. I have the run logs as well.Let’s stick to the black and white facts that what my car has achieved. Like it or lump it.... it happened. If you think I’m full of it, fine. If you think my car hasn’t achieved what I have said it has, fine.If you don’t like me, fine.If it’s any of the above why on earth are you reading this thread wasting your valuable time though?This is one of the threads on this forum that has one of the largest viewership. I must have a lot of haters. Some people need to relax a bit.... it’s only about tuning a car.

May be you should practice what you preach & chill out yourself instead of spitting your dummy out & slaging other people's RSs when you don't get the results you base your postings on ! 🤔

Dell.

[Lawrence]

Audirs3fightclub.com lol

[BenTTU]

I really hope I haven't upset you shaunee or any body else, I am purely just trying to see what you are achieving and why and how you have gone about it. 

 

Isn't this what your thread is about? 

 

Ben 

[Shaunee]

I really hope I haven't upset you shaunee or any body else, I am purely just trying to see what you are achieving and why and how you have gone about it. 

 

Isn't this what your thread is about? 

 

Ben 

 

All the information relating to the said runs can be found here ---> 

https://www.audirs3o...-14#entry107690

https://www.audirs3o...-14#entry107691

https://www.audirs3o...-15#entry109167

 

Unfortunately I'm not sure what other information I can provide you about what had been done on my map......... apart from giving you access to my map file. 

 

I've had many mapping sessions on many cars and used many different tuners.  They've ALL achieved different results (on the same car) and many have their own approach and ideas on what works well and what doesn't.  Some agree, some align in part and some differ greatly.

 

What looks good on a dyno graph doesn't always translate to a quick car on the black stuff.  It's why I look to measure where my car is on the black stuff, preferably at a leveller (imo) like Santa Pod.

[MrNoisy]

Deleted

Edited by MrNoisy, 13 February 2019 - 10:25 PM.

[BenTTU]

Very impressive times shaunnee, I take it that was with the hybrid or race fuel? 

[Shaunee]

Very impressive times shaunnee, I take it that was with the hybrid or race fuel?

Stock blower
Stock intake/inlet
Stock DSG map
Stock fuel system
99oct Tesco fuel
Forge FMIC
Decat Miltek secondaries
Litcho calibration
Full weight
Stock tyres

[BenTTU]

Stock blower
Stock intake/inlet
Stock DSG map
Stock fuel system
99oct Tesco fuel
Forge FMIC
Decat Miltek secondaries
Litcho calibration
Full weight
Stock tyres

Ok 

Edited by BenTTU, 14 February 2019 - 04:37 PM.

[Fenz]

With out trying to sound argumentative in any way as i am genuinely interested in this thread as i take my hat of to other companies that tackle big builds like our selves. 

 

But please explain your so called different approach? unless you use octane booster to squeeze that bit extra i can not see how any other tuner can do it different. 

Over speeding can be controlled, but on the flip side i can see why you had issues with the said turbo, but i wont get into that as its down to the builder to get it correct not for me to point out mistakes. Again a lesson i learnt the hard way. 

 

I see Dell claims your lying, get your slip out from santa pod to prove otherwise. 11.5 on a stage 2 tune kind of a world record on pump fuel? hopefully your build should see low 10s or even 9s? 

 

Ben

Actually Ben, my PFL car ran 11.49 here in aus as a stage 2 car. This was without an intercooler (with wmi) eventuri intake on pump gas 98 with full street trim and tyres. I posted my dragy sheets on this forum quite a while ago now before we started the big turbo build on the car.

[Shaunee]

Very quick update......

Went over to Litchos yesterday to see the car and personally fire her up! I haven’t done that for a while!

They have a small snagging list to sort over the next couple of weeks and then the intention is for me to use the car and get some feedback to Iain before it goes back again. They’ll then pull the turbo kit off and get it sent away to be dimple heat shielded , once that’s done Iain will turn the wick up to 11 on the 3576.

We’re assuming the current fuel system will cope enough to max out the 76 (we’ll find out soon enough) but I’m currently looking at secondary injection and LPFP upgrade now as I’ll certainly need this to exploit the 3582 for when that goes on, let alone the 3584. A couple of options exist.

Once I’m in a position to do so I’ll start posting dyno and acceleration data on the 3576 setup, that’s when the fun really starts for me!

I’m aiming to keep the car as OEM looking as possible, both outside and under the bonnet. I’ve decided to retain the stock “horrible” wheels and going to put the front number plate back in its original position.

The engine bay looks Uber understated currently..... I think I’m going to junk the REVO intake and get a custom made black crinkle painted inlet pipe made up. Full stealthfest!

Looking at my engine bay you wouldn’t know it had a 3576 and custom manifold strapped on the back of it.



Oh.... and I did take it out for a “gentle” punt yesterday, but more on this when I have some real world data to support any subjective comments.

Looks like the 3582 is trying to get in on the act already! Your time will come soon enough son!

[BenTTU]

Actually Ben, my PFL car ran 11.49 here in aus as a stage 2 car. This was without an intercooler (with wmi) eventuri intake on pump gas 98 with full street trim and tyres. I posted my dragy sheets on this forum quite a while ago now before we started the big turbo build on the car.

Like your post states with wmi  so your pump fuel goes from 98 to 105...so that doesn't count fella.

But makes perfect sense and a realistic time, wmi on a stock turbo will get you about 480hp. Which is bang on the money, you got any 100-200 times 

Ben

Edited by BenTTU, 23 February 2019 - 06:09 PM.

[Fenz]

Fair comment Ben, I wasn't running 100% meth at that time, but for sure there would have been a octane boost. I have just gone through some older Dragy record and it looks like all I have on there is a 8.8 - 100-200. Best now before the engine build with the big turbo is 6.2, we now have another 70wkw and if the bloody boost hose didn't keep blowing off we would have got some data with that by now. Waiting for Forge to send them now, so, hopefully this week we will run some times. 

[Shaunee]

Fair comment Ben, I wasn't running 100% meth at that time, but for sure there would have been a octane boost. I have just gone through some older Dragy record and it looks like all I have on there is a 8.8 - 100-200. Best now before the engine build with the big turbo is 6.2, we now have another 70wkw and if the bloody boost hose didn't keep blowing off we would have got some data with that by now. Waiting for Forge to send them now, so, hopefully this week we will run some times.

Hairspray on the ends!!! That will stop the pipes blowing off.

[BenTTU]

Fair comment Ben, I wasn't running 100% meth at that time, but for sure there would have been a octane boost. I have just gone through some older Dragy record and it looks like all I have on there is a 8.8 - 100-200. Best now before the engine build with the big turbo is 6.2, we now have another 70wkw and if the bloody boost hose didn't keep blowing off we would have got some data with that by now. Waiting for Forge to send them now, so, hopefully this week we will run some times. 

I didn't even think 100% meth I was thinking a 50 50 mix if you wad on stock cooler, as you would need to aid cooling. 

I would dismiss that 8.8 doesn't concur with your 11.49 imo..but then again I'm no 100 to 200 expert.

 

Big turbo builds are awesome, I've got to add meth to mine to see what the turbo can do with that on..then look at a 600hp hybrid route, once that is all done 700hp here we come.

 

Ben 

[Shaunee]

I didn't even think 100% meth I was thinking a 50 50 mix if you wad on stock cooler, as you would need to aid cooling. 

I would dismiss that 8.8 doesn't concur with your 11.49 imo..but then again I'm no 100 to 200 expert.

 

Big turbo builds are awesome, I've got to add meth to mine to see what the turbo can do with that on..then look at a 600hp hybrid route, once that is all done 700hp here we come.

 

Ben 

 

11.49s 1/4 and a matching 8.8s 100-200 is about on the nose I think.  I did 11.55s 1/4m and 8.9s 100-200 (on that same run) so all things being equal the reference points and comparisons are very similar.

[nickrs3]

Shaun new to the forum and thread, which I’ve just read start to finish - didn’t understand half of it but thoroughly enjoyed it - keep up the good work


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BenTTU]

11.49s 1/4 and a matching 8.8s 100-200 is about on the nose I think.  I did 11.55s 1/4m and 8.9s 100-200 (on that same run) so all things being equal the reference points and comparisons are very similar.

 

That's good then that would suggest you wasn't running a stage 2 tune if the gent is running meth at around 470 480hp

Edited by BenTTU, 24 February 2019 - 11:27 AM.

[Shaunee]

That's good then it will also suggest you was running about 470-480hp. 

 

lol - never in a month of Sundays on that stock blower and 99oct fuel.

[nickrs3]

Speaking with a friend that works for Audi the rattle is common in all panoramic roofs, the grease drys so the components rattle. They recommend the roof is serviced properly This involves removing the glass completely and cost a few hundred £, a lot of time they will say they have serviced it and won’t charge but the haven’t done a proper service therefore the problem is only fixed for a short period of time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BenTTU]

lol - never in a month of Sundays on that stock blower and 99oct fuel.

Totally agree so what was you running